The other day I saw on television an interview, where they spoke of "discrimination" and showed a man, who was blind and had a seeing-eye, a Labrador dog, who was discriminated wildly. Why is it that a taxi driver did not want to keep a dog because he does not like animals, but it is wrong for not want to keep a dog's eyes are blind. In a clinic not allowed to enter the blind since the administration had banned animals from entering, but the blind? It is common sense thing and that is what bothers me. How are we so square? How people no longer able to reason and empathize with the other to understand the problem? How do you not see that not just any dog \u200b\u200bbut taught to serve as a seeing-eye? What college did not read the Lazarillo de Tormes and do not know what a seeing-eye? Because if it was not allowed inside the blind, for fear of soiling the animal within the enclosure, then there is great ignorance, because dogs and cats are not like horses or cows that are making their needs as they walk. Dogs looking for their cat tree and looking for land (except for extreme situations where there find a decent place for their needs or who are "direct" and can not wait to find). I was so angry to see how the Chilean, has no common sense and does not think all because someone said so, so I loaded my limited work, where most people do what they say without thinking about whether what is done is right or wrong. So it is that I am a rebel. I rebel against the ignorance and folly. I rebel to follow the crowd. I rebel to not stop using my pa neurons that I have them!
